Political Quotes

Bill Delahunt: after offering this amendment, I intend to ask unanimous consent that it be withdrawn. Its purpose is to really send a…

On the recordJuly 18, 2001
after offering this amendment, I intend to ask unanimous consent that it be withdrawn. Its purpose is to really send a message, and there is no need for me to insist on a vote at this time. More than 2 years ago now, and I believe to the collective relief of nearly every Member of this body, the Independent Counsel Act expired. Since then, almost all of the investigations pending at that time have been brought to a close. Yet 2 years after the expiration of the statute, one Independent Counsel, David Barrett, is still going strong at the cost of some $2 million a year to the American taxpayers, with no end in sight. Mr. Barrett was appointed in May of 1995 to look into charges that former HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros had understated to the FBI the amount of money he had paid to a former mistress. It took Mr. Barrett more than 4 years and $9 million, but he eventually got his man. In the fall of 1999, almost 2 years ago, the former Secretary pled guilty to a single misdemeanor, for which he paid a fine and a $25 assessment for court costs. That was the rather anticlimactic end to the case involving Mr. Cisneros himself, but it was not the end of Mr. Barrett's investigation.
Said by
Bill Delahunt
Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the ongoing investigation by Independent Counsel David Barrett and its costs to taxpayers.

Share

More from Bill Delahunt

Jul 29, 2009

I applaud what you are trying to accomplish. I might have some disagreements in terms of degree, but I know what you are trying to do.

congress.gov
Apr 1, 2009

I mean, I am not really comfortable relying on the regulator that doesn't regulate for whatever reason.

congress.gov
Jul 7, 2009

These cases belong in article III courts. We have nothing to fear from our own courts.

congress.gov
Dec 10, 2009

That is why I take offense when I hear it is the Community Reinvestment Act that did this. That is baloney.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation