I think what is most interesting is that upon a careful and thorough analysis of the language that presently exists in title V, that there has been a conclusion by many legal scholars that that language is patently unconstitutional as a result of the decision in Missouri v. Jenkins. It is also clear that the Department of Justice will recommend a veto of this bill if it should pass, if this language is not deleted and the Boehlert-Delahunt amendment does not pass.
Bill Delahunt: “I think what is most interesting is that upon a careful and thorough analysis of the language that presently exists in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the constitutionality of language in title V and potential veto by the Department of Justice.
Share
More from Bill Delahunt
I think it says something about our system, our political system and how, you know, how there are powerful interests that oftentimes, I believe, don't really understand their own interests in the long term.
I believe ardently that it is the responsibility of these Committees to do the oversight that is necessary to repair the damage that was done in the preceding Administration to America's image.
If we continue to drag this out... we are going to find ourselves in a real serious, severe crisis.
God forbid they have a total collapse on the real estate market, we are going to be back to where we were in September of 2008.





