Political Quotes

Bill Delahunt: we would be derogating our duty. And I applaud the eloquence and the obviously genuine commitment that the gentleman…

On the recordJuly 8, 2003
we would be derogating our duty. And I applaud the eloquence and the obviously genuine commitment that the gentleman from Hawaii just respected. We would not be honoring our obligation, and additionally we would be failing those members in the military that have fought as well as they have, and we would be failing those individuals in the Intelligence Community that have expressed their views. It brings to mind a story that again appeared in the newspapers shortly before we broke, I think it was the day that we broke, where someone stood up and testified before a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. There was a number of intelligence officials within this closed hearing. Of course, it appears in the press, so I can speak about it. And this individual's name is Christian Westerman, and he happens to be a top State Department expert on chemical and biological weapons, and he told the committees that he had been pressed to tailor his analysis on Iraq and other matters specifically pertaining to Cuba to conform with the Bush administration's views. That is unacceptable. He is viewed within the Department, according to reports, as a careful and respected analyst of intelligence. He served in the Navy, and he was obviously not comfortable making that statement, but that kind of courage is important if we are going to ascertain the truth.
Said by
Bill Delahunt
Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the integrity of intelligence analysis and military obligations.

Share

More from Bill Delahunt

Jul 7, 2009

Who makes the determination as to who 'known terrorists' are?

congress.gov
May 20, 2009

If it is too big to fail, then you no longer have a--in my judgment, or at least in my limited economic perspective, that is not a free marketplace.

congress.gov
Dec 10, 2009

God forbid they have a total collapse on the real estate market, we are going to be back to where we were in September of 2008.

congress.gov
Jun 23, 2009

There should be no doubt that we need a new regulatory framework and as importantly sustained supervision of the financial system.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation