I would say yes, the taxpayers do pay. It is a matter of national defense. Where people are building and incurring risks, they should pay for it themselves. I accept that point. We are talking about how we respond to Osama bin Laden or other murderers who would attack this country. I think it is appropriate that the country as a whole respond, and not allow the terrorists to pick and choose which Americans will have to suffer disproportionately.
Barney Frank: “I would say yes, the taxpayers do pay. It is a matter of national defense. Where people are building and incurring…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing national defense and taxpayer responsibility in response to terrorism.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Protection and advocacy Agencies, which are Federally funded entities charged with enforcing the rights of persons with disabilities.
It was a great mistake to push lower income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'
I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.





