Virtually every piece of legislation we deal with, because this legislation has two parts, one part which will reduce an existing liability, that is, there is already out there a flood insurance liability. This bill, unanimously agreed to by all in the committee who worked on it, will reduce that in the flood part. With regard to water, this will raise premiums and restrict placement. With regard to the new part, the wind part, it will create no liability, because as I have said several times, the bill strictly says that premiums will have to be actuarially sound. And CBO has certified that that is accurate. So CBO has certified this will, over time, produce no new liability on wind and save money on water.
Barney Frank: “Virtually every piece of legislation we deal with, because this legislation has two parts, one part which will reduce an…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a flood insurance bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Congress generally, and this subcommittee in particular has historically played a critical role in strengthening accountability at the World Bank.
For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…
Protection and advocacy Agencies, which are Federally funded entities charged with enforcing the rights of persons with disabilities.
I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.





