Political Quotes

On the recordApril 23, 1998
Mr. Chairman, we will now find out if on the Republican side sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I opposed an amendment that was offered before by the gentleman from California that would have created a brand-new privilege, a parent-child privilege, not on the grounds that it was an unthinkable idea but that dealing with a subject of that complexity and that impact for the first time on the floor of the House without having gone through any of our procedure was not a good idea. The majority agreed with me. I make the same argument here. Actually, this is not so much an amendment as it is a periodical. I have gotten four versions of it. I understand that. I am holding all four versions of it. First, it said earlier today it would only apply if the defendant was not primarily engaged in a profit-seeking purpose. Then we got profit-seeking purpose or committed bodily injury. Then we got, we struck bodily injury, and we got criminal offense. Then we got a conforming amendment. I do not criticize the drafters. They are doing a very good job, but this is a work in progress. We have gotten four versions of it because they are trying to deal with a complex subject. I understand that this is a response to a decision that was just made, but let me make a point that I thought was clear. You run the place. You control the committees. You could schedule a hearing next week. You could schedule a markup the week after.
Said by
Barney Frank
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the complexities of legislative amendments and the need for proper procedure.

Share

More from Barney Frank

Jul 11, 2016

The relationship between elected officials and his or her constituents is paramount.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

I was one of three Members of the House who voted against that. Three of us, Ron Paul, Dave Wu, and I voted to allow this bigot to continue to demonstrate his bigotry.

congress.gov
Feb 5, 2024

it was because they were banking crypto, not because they were insolvent.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

This is not a bill to protect religious liberty in general. It singles out one particular religious tenet.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation