I did not think that the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate accountability bill came as entirely a shock to Members on the other side of the aisle. All we are asking for and all I mentioned was let us fund the Securities and Exchange Commission at the level this House and the rest of the government said was appropriate last August. It is not a complicated matter. I am not trying to raise new obstacles. The gentleman said this is just an ordinary bill. I thought there was a decision by the Congress and the President last summer that ordinary was not good enough for the Securities and Exchange Commission, that we had to do some extraordinary things to combat abuses in the securities industry. So when I say that we should fund the level that we said we would fund, apparently for the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Istook) that is too complicated.
Barney Frank: “I did not think that the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate accountability bill came as entirely a shock to Members on the other…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding of the Securities and Exchange Commission in relation to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Just as I would say if you say you'd believe in racial discrimination or religious discrimination, any time you are at an agency that's in charge of protecting and enforcing constitutional rights and you express your view that that…
I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.
If you're going to dip your fingers in the Federal till, don't complain if a little democracy rubs off on them.
The relationship between elected officials and his or her constituents is paramount.





