my point was that it would be confusing if the gentleman had accepted the motion and simultaneously disregarded it. So it seemed to me what he was saying was he intended to make exceptions to it, and that ``acceptance'' and ``exception'' got confused, because the gentleman said he was going to vote for a motion which required additional spending which he then said he planned to oppose. Since that would not have made any sense, I tried to follow the principle that you try to listen to what people say and you try to make some sense out of it.
Barney Frank: “my point was that it would be confusing if the gentleman had accepted the motion and simultaneously disregarded it. So…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing confusion over a motion and its implications during a floor debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
It was a great mistake to push lower income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may not exercise any rulemaking, supervisory, enforcement, or any other authority including any authority to order assessments over a motor vehicle dealer that is predominantly engaged in the sale…
Congress generally, and this subcommittee in particular has historically played a critical role in strengthening accountability at the World Bank.
I was one of three Members of the House who voted against that. Three of us, Ron Paul, Dave Wu, and I voted to allow this bigot to continue to demonstrate his bigotry.





