Political Quotes

On the recordApril 23, 1998
And I am glad the gentleman from Texas does, and therefore there is no reason to interrupt me. Let me just say to my friend he should only interrupt me when he disagrees with me. He need not interrupt me when he agrees with me. He should just nod his head and we will all notice that. But I appreciate the agreement. So we are now in agreement that we are talking about nonviolent felons, and they said including people who may have been convicted of tax fraud or insurance fraud. Secondly, though, this does say no release could be a remedy because of conditions of confinement or. Now the gentleman says it is only overcrowding, but the word ``or'' apparently means something different to me than it does to the gentleman. ``Or'' generally means there is something else that is involved. It says these insurance fraud perpetrators cannot be released either because of conditions of confinement or because of the effects of actions by government officials on the lives of persons confined in prison. In other words, if prison officials are grossly violating people's rights, and even people who have committed fraud have rights, as we all agree, even if it is not overcrowded, but if it deals with violations of their rights by conscious acts, one of the remedies cannot be to release people.
Said by
Barney Frank
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of a bill regarding nonviolent felons and conditions of confinement.

Share

More from Barney Frank

Mar 29, 2017

the very vitality of America's free enterprise economy is rooted in property rights, and without them, capital can't make wise investments.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

If you're going to dip your fingers in the Federal till, don't complain if a little democracy rubs off on them.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

This bill--and I will differ specifically with Mr. Labrador on this--empowers people to take my tax money and use it to do things and then exclude me and Jim from its benefit.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

This is not a bill to protect religious liberty in general. It singles out one particular religious tenet.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation