So, Madam Chairman, there is an urgency to providing this protection for the recipients and benefits, which is not the same as for more sophisticated, better financed litigants who were dealing with public policy in the field of labor law, securities law, et cetera. I would hope the amendment would be adopted. I would hope to work with the gentleman. I must say I was almost surprised the bill came up too soon. I think one of the issues was that we had some time to fill. I was hoping we could have worked a little bit more on some amendments. Faced with this choice now, I think it would be important for us to adopt the amendment because, otherwise, we run the risk of a nonoverrideable veto that would deny the people whose plight led us to get into this years ago, the beneficiaries of disability programs and others who were being hurt. I do not want to put their right to get the benefit of this good legislation at risk, and that is why I hope the amendment is adopted.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the urgency of protecting recipients of disability programs during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Critically I made sure that the United States reserve the right to maintain and enforce existing sanctions and even to deploy new sanctions to address those continuing concerns which we fully intend to do when circumstances warrant.
I was one of three Members of the House who voted against that. Three of us, Ron Paul, Dave Wu, and I voted to allow this bigot to continue to demonstrate his bigotry.
Just as I would say if you say you'd believe in racial discrimination or religious discrimination, any time you are at an agency that's in charge of protecting and enforcing constitutional rights and you express your view that that…





