I would correct the gentleman on one thing. Remember, when we take programs for the poor and we do not keep them up with inflation, that is not a cut, that is an increase. It is only a cut when we fail to give an inflationary increase for the military and for science and for agriculture. So the gentleman should be clear. When the poor people fail to get enough money to keep up with inflation, they should be grateful for the little we gave them in the first place. It is only when the military or science or those other favored programs do not get inflation that an increase is a cut.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of inflation on funding for social programs versus military and science funding.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Congress generally, and this subcommittee in particular has historically played a critical role in strengthening accountability at the World Bank.
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'
This bill--and I will differ specifically with Mr. Labrador on this--empowers people to take my tax money and use it to do things and then exclude me and Jim from its benefit.
No one doubts that if a change in administration comes and the new President disagrees with the existing Director, he or she can be removed.





