Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 25, 1998
If the United States Congress, in this, so substantially diminishes this notion of contributory and vicarious liability and exempts people who are making money by playing other people's music, or maybe showing other people's movies, or in other ways using other people's products, if we exempt them in some ways, we drive a hole in our efforts to enforce American intellectual property rights overseas that is enormous. Think what the People's Republic of China could do with the amendment of the gentleman from Wisconsin. All they would have to do is say, okay, we are going to take these principles that the American Congress has adopted; there will be no vicarious and contributory liability. If you catch the individual, that is fine; otherwise, no, there is no liability. And if it is only incidental to some other use, there is going to be no liability. We severely threaten our ability to protect one of the major sources internationally by which America profits, and that is intellectual property.
Said by
Barney Frank
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of an amendment on intellectual property rights.

Share

More from Barney Frank

Apr 5, 2017

For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

how do you morally justify further disadvantaging that child by denying him or her benefits? Because that's what this bill allows.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

Well, I--look, there are people who think Elvis is alive, but I don't think that's accurate.

congress.gov
Feb 5, 2024

it was because they were banking crypto, not because they were insolvent.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation