On the recordSeptember 10, 2003
I yield myself 1 minute and would say first that the gentleman has correctly stated it. And, frankly, I relied when that amendment was offered on what he now concedes was a misinterpretation. That is not a good way to legislate. And I am disappointed that the gentleman is going to try to keep the advantage of that misunderstanding. Secondly, it is inaccurate to say that this amendment that I am now offering would cover everybody. I have agreed to exempt in this amendment the local credit agencies. I am talking about the national specialized ones. They are the primary difference between us. The gentleman acknowledges and he explained an amendment that I did not think and I guess he did not think covered people like MIB. We did not object to it. It was not carefully read. We accepted the description. He says through inadvertence it went too far. That happens. But I think it is frankly inappropriate in terms of our legislatively working together to insist on that, particularly since I am not trying to restore the original language. I am excluding the small ones. Mr. Chairman, what this does is this covers the few regional ones, but mostly it covers national specialized agencies which do not merit the description of those who are too poor.
Source
govinfo.gov




