No. I am yielding for the purpose of a question. Answer the question. The gentleman said, the choice is to either put it into affordable housing or put it into the deficit. It doesn't go into the deficit now. It is Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profit. Nothing in his amendment that I read would put it into the deficit. Would he please explain to me what his statement meant and how it is accurate, and I will yield for that purpose.
Barney Frank: “No. I am yielding for the purpose of a question. Answer the question. The gentleman said, the choice is to either put it…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning a colleague's statement regarding funding for affordable housing and the deficit.
Share
More from Barney Frank
For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…
Barney Frank said that he believed that it was a war on crypto that motivated this--not a systemic risk of crypto.
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'
People around the world have learned they can claim asylum and remain in the U.S. indefinitely to pursue their claims.





