We do not serve the cause of justice by confusing unhappiness with particular judges and particular decisions with the functions of the judiciary. The gentleman is making a valiant effort to protect that function. I hope that in some other context those efforts are more successful. I regret, although I understand fully, the situation in which he found himself, that we will not be able to vote on it now. I will say, as an aside, this does make it an easier decision for me because, had the gentleman offered the amendment and had it been succeeded, I would have been conflicted, but now I can vote against what I think is kind of a silly bill without any problem.
Barney Frank: “We do not serve the cause of justice by confusing unhappiness with particular judges and particular decisions with the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do very good work, and they are not endangering the fiscal health of this country.
Protection and advocacy Agencies, which are Federally funded entities charged with enforcing the rights of persons with disabilities.
For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'





