let me take back my time. There were two different California issues here. Of course, one would not expect California to settle for only one controversy. The gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Bachus) is correctly alluding to the future issue of so-called SB1. But what the gentleman from California had identified to me before that had passed was preemption of existing California where it predates the recent enactment. And that is the concern that I was alluding to.
Barney Frank: “let me take back my time. There were two different California issues here. Of course, one would not expect California to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing California issues related to legislation during a floor debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.
They shouldn't lose their tax-exempt status but neither should they be able to go for a Federal grant as they would be under this bill.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may not exercise any rulemaking, supervisory, enforcement, or any other authority including any authority to order assessments over a motor vehicle dealer that is predominantly engaged in the sale…
It was a great mistake to push lower income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.





