As I read this, I do not believe filtering equipment would be a complete affirmative defense, as I read the line about affirmative defenses. But I then had a question. It says material that is harmful to minors, and I gather in a picture or text that would be describing sex and would appeal to prurient interests. A question would be if a commercial entity took the Starr report, which was not copyrighted, and put it out on the web as part of their business-making enterprise, would a commercial business that put the Starr report out on the web and did not restrict it with filtering information, would that commercial enterprise be subject to a penalty under this bill?
Barney Frank: “As I read this, I do not believe filtering equipment would be a complete affirmative defense, as I read the line about…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing implications of filtering equipment and penalties for commercial entities under a specific bill.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Protection and advocacy Agencies, which are Federally funded entities charged with enforcing the rights of persons with disabilities.
For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…
It was a great mistake to push lower income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'





