The gentleman is ignoring the fact that with his amendment that he is putting forward today, and we will cut taxes this year, I think by more than we should but we will, if we decide next year that at the level of revenue available for Medicare we cannot afford a prescription drug program, it will take two-thirds to put one back. That is the flaw in the gentleman's reasoning.
Discussing the implications of a tax cut amendment on Medicare funding.
Share
More from Barney Frank
We should have made it much higher, $125 billion or more, and we should have indexed it.
Barney Frank said that he believed that it was a war on crypto that motivated this--not a systemic risk of crypto.
People around the world have learned they can claim asylum and remain in the U.S. indefinitely to pursue their claims.
It was a great mistake to push lower income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
Other voices in this conversation
