those who are arguing that the current form of the balanced budget amendment puts Social Security at risk are undeniably correct. The amendment says that in the year 2002 it will be mandatory that any surplus from Social Security be used to reduce the overall deficit elsewhere in the Federal Government for the purposes of achieving balance. What this means is that there will be a constitutional imperative to the Congress to cut Social Security expenditures if they need to do that to make up the deficit elsewhere. That is not an academic threat. The Speaker of this House has demanded that the Bureau of Labor Statistics recalculate the Consumer Price Index. Reducing the Consumer Price Index has as its major impact saying that older people get less of a cost-of-living increase under Social Security. So when the Republicans push a form of the balanced budget amendment that allows, indeed, compels, any surplus in Social Security to be used to offset a deficit elsewhere and simultaneously argues that we should cut the Consumer Price Index, which has as its major fiscal impact reducing the cost-of-living increase, we see why Senators are right to oppose this amendment in its current form.
On the recordMarch 2, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the balanced budget amendment on Social Security during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
May 15, 2025
People around the world have learned they can claim asylum and remain in the U.S. indefinitely to pursue their claims.
Oct 21, 2019
I think it is clear that Fannie and Freddie are sufficiently secure so they are in no great danger.
Mar 20, 2017
No one doubts that if a change in administration comes and the new President disagrees with the existing Director, he or she can be removed.
Apr 5, 2017
I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.





