I now want to go back and make my central point, which is that the only reason this has any impact on the taxpayer is that the Republicans insisted on protecting the large institutions. The gentleman from Alabama said all this money is going to the large institutions. Well, that's not true, because it does go to pay off loans to keep people from being foreclosed. Some will go to smaller institutions. Some will go to credit unions. Some will go to community banks. But here is the point: under our proposal, which the Republicans temporarily blocked--and I hope they'll repent--all of the funding would have come from the large institutions, but the Members don't want to address that. Under our proposal in the bill that passed--and we had to amend it, and we're going to try and come back and change it again--every single penny that will be expended here will come from institutions of more than $50 billion in assets and hedge funds of more than $10 billion in assets.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the impact of funding on taxpayers and the role of large financial institutions.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Critically I made sure that the United States reserve the right to maintain and enforce existing sanctions and even to deploy new sanctions to address those continuing concerns which we fully intend to do when circumstances warrant.
the very vitality of America's free enterprise economy is rooted in property rights, and without them, capital can't make wise investments.
It was a great mistake to push lower income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
This bill--and I will differ specifically with Mr. Labrador on this--empowers people to take my tax money and use it to do things and then exclude me and Jim from its benefit.





