Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 11, 2011
First of all, the last statement is, of course, totally contradictory from the gentleman from Texas. But when you just want to bash things, you will say anything. You cannot simultaneously say this program is too generous because of its forgiveness and is a predatory loan. The fact is it has very generous forgiveness provisions, which is why it is scored at 84 percent, not 98 percent. So that argument the gentleman just made is, of course, entirely self-contradictory because it can't be both. Secondly, as to agriculture, I did vote for an amendment that would change it, but the gentleman, the spectacle of my Republican colleagues hiding behind Obama is bizarre. You could have done what we have offered, which was to cut the $150 million from going to Brazil and then cut it out of America. But it's not the only item I mentioned. I mentioned the $1.2 billion the gentleman wanted to send to Iraqi security forces, the 400 million to build infrastructure in Kandahar and Kabul, the $250,000 limit the Republicans rejected on individual entities. So, no, there are billions in agriculture and the military. I didn't just mention one item. The gentlemen do understand that they are vulnerable, so they blame Obama. They and Obama are both wrong about sending money to Brazil. But the most important point is this, and I hope in his final time the gentleman from Alabama will address it.
Said by
Barney Frank
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses contradictions in arguments about program funding and critiques Republican colleagues' positions.

Share

More from Barney Frank

Mar 20, 2017

No one doubts that if a change in administration comes and the new President disagrees with the existing Director, he or she can be removed.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

I want to respond to Ms. Waggoner who reads the bill--yes, you read the bill; you don't read every other line.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

The Supreme Court says we have a right to be married. There is no Federal legislation and in many States no other legislation that protects us against discrimination.

congress.gov
Feb 5, 2024

it was because they were banking crypto, not because they were insolvent.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation