I hope Members will be careful walking on the floor right now, especially on the Republican side of the aisle, because I wouldn't want anyone to fall into the enormous gap that has just been created between the gentleman's comments and his voting record. Mr. Chairman, we heard a great argument about the need to cut the budget deficit and stop spending. During the recent debate on the budget, an amendment was offered to limit entitlement spending to farmers to $250,000 per entity. The amendment said no agricultural entity, no individual, could get more than $250,000 per year. It was defeated by the Republican Party. The majority of Democrats voted for it. It will cost $1 billion over 10 years--at least. We had the Brazilian cotton farmers, but my friends on the other side hate for me to mention that because unpleasant reality is always bothersome. You know, over a 4-year period, we're going to spend more money subsidizing American and Brazilian cotton farmers than we are on this program.
On the recordMarch 11, 2011
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
The speaker addresses budget cuts and agricultural subsidies during a debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Jul 11, 2016
I was one of three Members of the House who voted against that. Three of us, Ron Paul, Dave Wu, and I voted to allow this bigot to continue to demonstrate his bigotry.
Jul 8, 2015
I am tired of the Republicans' death-by-1,000-cuts strategy to roll back the significant gains we have made since Dodd-Frank enactment.
May 11, 2016
Critically I made sure that the United States reserve the right to maintain and enforce existing sanctions and even to deploy new sanctions to address those continuing concerns which we fully intend to do when circumstances warrant.
Jul 11, 2016
Well, I--look, there are people who think Elvis is alive, but I don't think that's accurate.





