On the recordFebruary 17, 2011
I want to stress again, I have not heard a defense of the proposal that we remove from the Federal Government the highest profile individual charged with controlling compensation excesses at four companies which continue to be the recipients of special assistance. I do not understand this desire to free AIG from restrictions and General Motors and Chrysler. They have been successful, and I'm glad, but they owe the Federal Government money. Allied, the financial company, owes the Federal Government money. I do not understand, you can go one by one and I haven't heard a defense of it. Why would we say that the individual most responsible for limiting excessive compensation to TARP recipients should no longer be able to work for the Federal Government and no one should be able to fill that position?





