I think this is a bad idea, and I am somewhat confused. By the way, we will be debating tomorrow a bill which restricts rulemaking, and it exempts the Federal Reserve, as I read it. So we're kind of on again/off again about the Federal Reserve. It seems to me what we're talking about is taking some fake punches at the Federal Reserve but not doing anything serious. My Republican colleagues brought up a reconciliation bill that was going to subject the Consumer Bureau to appropriations. {time} 1520 So I offered an amendment to subject the Federal Reserve to appropriations. That was voted down. So we're not going to restrict their rulemaking. We're not going to subject them to appropriations, even though that's being done elsewhere. We're going to audit them, which is a way to look tough without really being tough.
Barney Frank: “I think this is a bad idea, and I am somewhat confused. By the way, we will be debating tomorrow a bill which restricts…”
On the recordJuly 24, 2012
Share
More from Barney Frank
Jul 21, 2015
I do think there is a tendency for an overreach by the FSOC. I do not think straightforward insurance companies or money managers should be covered and regulated as SIFIs.
May 11, 2016
Critically I made sure that the United States reserve the right to maintain and enforce existing sanctions and even to deploy new sanctions to address those continuing concerns which we fully intend to do when circumstances warrant.
Apr 5, 2017
For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…





