The fact is that it was a Republican House that passed the bill the gentleman is denouncing, and I don't know why he keeps mentioning history and leaving that out until he has to be reminded. He did offer an amendment. He was overwhelmingly defeated. More than two-thirds of the Republicans voted against him. By the way, as to my own view, yes, in 2003 I said there was no problem. In 2004, after President Bush, while the Republicans controlled Congress and didn't hinder him, ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase their purchase of loans from people below the median, I changed my position. So I joined the Republican leadership of the House as a fairly minor player in supporting legislation. He was against it, and I would just make that point again.
Barney Frank: “The fact is that it was a Republican House that passed the bill the gentleman is denouncing, and I don't know why he…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the history of a bill passed by the Republican-controlled House and discusses his changing position on related issues.
Share
More from Barney Frank
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'
This is a legislative enactment that essentially says that the fact that I live in a loving committed marriage with another man is somehow a threat to other people's freedom.
I think it is clear that Fannie and Freddie are sufficiently secure so they are in no great danger.
I want to respond to Ms. Waggoner who reads the bill--yes, you read the bill; you don't read every other line.





