The previous remarks highlight the disconnect between reality and what the opponents are saying. There is now on the books such a mandate. The gentleman acts as if this amendment would create it. The law now says, and has for 10 years, that you must show to the employer that you are legally entitled to work in the United States. Employers are legally at risk. If they fail to ask and it turns out they have hired someone who is not legally entitled to work, they are at risk. I do not understand this argument. If you want to abolish sanctions, okay, but you cannot argue that this amendment creates an obligation which we have had for 10 years. I would point out, by the way, that it is so onerous an obligation that most people apparently do not even realize we have it.
Barney Frank: “The previous remarks highlight the disconnect between reality and what the opponents are saying. There is now on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the existing legal obligations for employers regarding employee work eligibility.
Share
More from Barney Frank
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'
Barney Frank said that he believed that it was a war on crypto that motivated this--not a systemic risk of crypto.
Congress generally, and this subcommittee in particular has historically played a critical role in strengthening accountability at the World Bank.
For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…





