Political Quotes

On the recordApril 15, 1997
reclaiming my time, let me be clear. The gentleman did not mean, and I apologize to the gentleman, I will not in the future confuse what he says with what he believes, if that is what I am supposed to interpret. It did seem to me like he was saying we will let the President do that one. In fact, however, the point is still valid. This amendment does not deal with the Internal Revenue Code, big ``I'', big ``R'', big ``C''. It says the generic, the internal revenue of the United States. And cutting the CPI would increase the internal revenue of the United States, and it would clearly require a two-thirds vote. The point is it should not require a two-thirds vote. Democracy should be allowed to function. Today there is not a majority in this country for raising taxes. There might be a majority for reducing taxes. Suppose 10 years from now there is a different majority. Suppose 10 years from now people have changed their views? We have had economic growth; they want to deal more fully with certain things. They, in fact, decide they have to get that debt down and they would be willing to vote a tax increase dedicated to reducing the national debt. That ought to be a decision that the majority of the American people could take if they want to, and this is one more obstacle that we are trying to put in the way, those who support this, in the path of a majority. The majority today ought to do what it thinks is right. If it wants to reduce taxes, it should reduce taxes.
Said by
Barney Frank
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of an amendment related to tax policy and majority rule.

Share

More from Barney Frank

Mar 29, 2017

the very vitality of America's free enterprise economy is rooted in property rights, and without them, capital can't make wise investments.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

Yes, I was frankly struck that Mr. Labrador went to such great pains to deny this.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

I am in favor of any opinion anywhere.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

This is a legislative enactment that essentially says that the fact that I live in a loving committed marriage with another man is somehow a threat to other people's freedom.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation