Mr. Speaker, I am fascinated by this piece of legislation. It is an act of repudiation of several of the principles that the majority has said it was governed by. In some cases I am glad to see the repudiation because I was not too crazy about the principles; in other cases I like the principles and I am sorry to see them eroded. But let us look at what this bill does. The expansion of gambling has on the whole been a matter of decisions by the States. It is true that there is a Federal statute which grants the rights of Indian tribes, in return for their having given up rights to property, by the way. The Indian tribes did not get this right to conduct gambling one-sidedly. They gave up, as a result of this act, some substantial property claims. But Indian gambling is only a part of what is being studied here. If this is a bill to study and look at the Indian Gaming Act, it would have been a different story. It would have come out of a different committee. Much of the impetus for this comes from the feeling of the Members of Congress, apparently very much on the majority side, too, that we cannot trust State and local officials to make good decisions without our supervision. I have to say I think the chairman of the committee has been very responsible and has helped improve the bill. It is a better bill than before.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to gambling and the Indian Gaming Act.
Share
More from Barney Frank
the very vitality of America's free enterprise economy is rooted in property rights, and without them, capital can't make wise investments.
This bill--and I will differ specifically with Mr. Labrador on this--empowers people to take my tax money and use it to do things and then exclude me and Jim from its benefit.
This is a legislative enactment that essentially says that the fact that I live in a loving committed marriage with another man is somehow a threat to other people's freedom.
Just as I would say if you say you'd believe in racial discrimination or religious discrimination, any time you are at an agency that's in charge of protecting and enforcing constitutional rights and you express your view that that…





