Political Quotes

On the recordMay 21, 1998
Last year we passed overwhelmingly, unanimously, an amendment that said the United States will not spend more than $200 million per year for our share of the cost of NATO expansion. NATO expansion is one thing. But an American subsidy of France and Germany and England and Italy and Scandinavia and the Benelux countries is quite another. We have a continuing problem. Our wealthy, powerful European allies, who do not themselves face serious threats, have gotten so used to the American taxpayer picking up the tab for the common defense that they do not make a contribution. Part of the objection to NATO was an objection over an excessive contribution from Americans. We in this amendment take what the State Department and Defense Department told us it would cost and we say that will be the maximum.
Said by
Barney Frank
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing U.S. financial contributions to NATO during a House floor debate.

Share

More from Barney Frank

Jul 11, 2016

If you're going to dip your fingers in the Federal till, don't complain if a little democracy rubs off on them.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

I want to respond to Ms. Waggoner who reads the bill--yes, you read the bill; you don't read every other line.

congress.gov
Jul 12, 2017

We should have made it much higher, $125 billion or more, and we should have indexed it.

congress.gov
Jul 21, 2015

I do think there is a tendency for an overreach by the FSOC. I do not think straightforward insurance companies or money managers should be covered and regulated as SIFIs.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation