Yes, it is. And here's the point. And if the gentleman would yield to me. I do not think, and it says, disabled homeless veterans. I would agree between now and when we get to conference to give a first preference to disabled homeless veterans. I have two problems with this amendment. First of all, it is not clear that there are that many disabled homeless veterans to absorb 800 million a year. If there are you could deal with it. But secondly, I do not think in many parts of the country, including my own, that if you only did vouchers you would be doing enough for them. I'd like to build some housing, some with supportive services. But I will give the gentleman my commitment that in the final bill we should be giving a very high preference to disabled homeless veterans.
Barney Frank: “Yes, it is. And here's the point. And if the gentleman would yield to me. I do not think, and it says, disabled homeless…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to funding for disabled homeless veterans.
Share
More from Barney Frank
People around the world have learned they can claim asylum and remain in the U.S. indefinitely to pursue their claims.
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'
I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.
We should have made it much higher, $125 billion or more, and we should have indexed it.





