Political Quotes

On the recordApril 17, 1997
Mr. Chairman, the point is this. We are talking about a very, very limited circumstance. I think to some extent what we may be patenting-- and maybe you cannot patent this, maybe we would copyright it--examples of horrible and extremist that we can come up with that might possibly under certain circumstances create a problem. The gentleman from California has had one. Here is what I think he is positing. You apply for a patent. Your patent application is published. You subsequently decide that you are not going to get the patent, so you withdraw it and have you then lost your right to protect it under trade secrets? I do not think it would do any violence to the bill in that circumstance where no one had previously suggested to say that no, you would not lose that. I would be glad to do that. I would be glad to support an amendment in a subsequent part of the process that said if in fact the only thing that happened was that you were published and you were not going to get a patent, that that would not destroy your limited right of trade secrets. That one does not bother me at all. It is the first I had heard of it in all my conversations with the gentleman.
Said by
Barney Frank
Democratic · Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing patent applications and trade secret protections during a committee meeting.

Share

More from Barney Frank

Apr 5, 2017

I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.

congress.gov
Jul 11, 2016

The Supreme Court says we have a right to be married. There is no Federal legislation and in many States no other legislation that protects us against discrimination.

congress.gov
Jul 21, 2015

I do think there is a tendency for an overreach by the FSOC. I do not think straightforward insurance companies or money managers should be covered and regulated as SIFIs.

congress.gov
Feb 5, 2024

it was because they were banking crypto, not because they were insolvent.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation