I am all for this. I was not aware that there were many meetings that were not open. Most of the Members I know generally try to get the press to come to their meetings rather than keep them away, but I think it is important that we do this because we not only govern ourselves, we set an example, and I think it is important for us to pass this by a big vote and set an example of openness. Now my friend referred to GOPAC, and he should not have, apparently under the rules, talked about the substance. But what is important is the example we will set. There are political organizations controlled by Members of this House that are not open. What better way to encourage them to do the right thing? What better way to tell the people of GOPAC that they should be open than for us to follow that same rule? So, let us set the example, and let GOPAC profit by our example, and let those who are so worried that we would even discuss it on the floor of the House----
On the recordJanuary 4, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of openness in meetings and setting an example for political organizations.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Mar 20, 2017
No one doubts that if a change in administration comes and the new President disagrees with the existing Director, he or she can be removed.
Jul 11, 2016
This bill--and I will differ specifically with Mr. Labrador on this--empowers people to take my tax money and use it to do things and then exclude me and Jim from its benefit.
Nov 12, 2019
Congress generally, and this subcommittee in particular has historically played a critical role in strengthening accountability at the World Bank.
Jul 11, 2016
how do you morally justify further disadvantaging that child by denying him or her benefits? Because that's what this bill allows.





