Some of us do differ on the role of affirmative action with regard to race and gender. But I know of no advocate of affirmative action with regard to sexual orientation nor, by the way, with religion and age... The notion that because a category is in this executive order it will lead to affirmative action is belied by the fact that over many, many years no one has ever seen an affirmative action, an affirmative outreach, an affirmative anything program with regard to many of the categories covered. The President has specifically disavowed any intention of affirmative action with regard to sexual orientation... We are not arguing for affirmative action in that context. I think the gentleman from California, and I would be glad to yield him again, has made a very important point. Those of us who have a disagreement about affirmative action have it with regard to race and with gender, but no one is an advocate of it being used here.
Barney Frank: “Some of us do differ on the role of affirmative action with regard to race and gender. But I know of no advocate of…”
On the recordAugust 5, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an executive order on affirmative action related to various categories.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Jul 21, 2015
I do think there is a tendency for an overreach by the FSOC. I do not think straightforward insurance companies or money managers should be covered and regulated as SIFIs.
Jul 11, 2016
Yes, I was frankly struck that Mr. Labrador went to such great pains to deny this.
May 11, 2016
Critically I made sure that the United States reserve the right to maintain and enforce existing sanctions and even to deploy new sanctions to address those continuing concerns which we fully intend to do when circumstances warrant.
Jul 11, 2016
This is not a bill to protect religious liberty in general. It singles out one particular religious tenet.





