I would take back my time to point out to the gentleman that if the amendment that the gentlewoman from Colorado [Mrs. Schroeder] offered passes, you will still have $5 billion over the President's request. If the amendment of the gentleman from Connecticut [Mr. Shays], I, the gentleman from Wisconsin [Mr. Neumann], and others is adopted, you will have $9 billion over the President's request. The fact is that you do not have to listen to the President's request. So the notion that by cutting $1.8 billion, which would still leave it $9 billion over the President's request, we have endangered that $475 million, I guess that is the kind of excessive threat assessment that leads you to think that you have got to keep pumping this bill up. But the fact is that there is no rational connection between the two and this is a preview of coming distractions.
On the recordJune 13, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing budget amendments and their implications during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
Jul 11, 2016
This is a legislative enactment that essentially says that the fact that I live in a loving committed marriage with another man is somehow a threat to other people's freedom.
Oct 21, 2019
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do very good work, and they are not endangering the fiscal health of this country.
Apr 5, 2017
For example, there are key differences in product characteristics between payday, car title, and other high-cost secured loans and more traditional closed-end unsecured lending and related products, and the products are often regulated…
Jul 11, 2016
Well, I--look, there are people who think Elvis is alive, but I don't think that's accurate.





