If the gentleman's interpretation, I mean this seriously, if the gentleman's interpretation of Romer versus Evans is correct, and we do not know whether it is or not, would that not also apply then to the section here? In other words, if the court were to hold under Romer versus Evans----
Discussing the implications of the Romer v. Evans case during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
I know people in my district who have gone to jail for writing bad checks for $1,000 and yet these people are still walking around.
I think it is clear that Fannie and Freddie are sufficiently secure so they are in no great danger.
It was a great mistake to push lower income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it.
The Supreme Court says we have a right to be married. There is no Federal legislation and in many States no other legislation that protects us against discrimination.
Other voices in this conversation
