I was surprised to hear the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon] say that there will be no more deficit spending with the Republicans in control. I had understood the Republican budget to accept the reality of the fact that there will be deficit spending for the next 6 years. The 7-year budget means that the deficit ends in the seventh year, but for the first 6 years of the Republican budget there is a deficit. So, to say that there will be no more deficit spending is to assume that we will go into a coma for 6 years and then come out in the seventh. Mr. Speaker, the gentleman from New York did have a tougher budget. It is true. It was a very tough budget. That is why I believe a majority of the Republicans voted against it. But the key here is procedural and not substantive. I gather this is the first time the House has been asked, not at the end of the session when we are trying to clean things up, but at the very outset of a session to change the rules substantially to diminish the chance to discuss publicly major legislation. Mr. Speaker, this is doing away with the two-thirds vote. For a group that came in boasting about how open and democratic they were going to be, this is an extraordinary diminution of our ability as a legislative body to discuss things.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Republican budget and its implications for deficit spending during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Barney Frank
I urge staff to pay close attention to the differences in products offered by nonbank institutions and to be mindful of Congress's intent in financial reform that State consumer protection laws be preserved to the extent possible.
Barney Frank, the author of the Dodd-Frank bill, in this committee, sitting in that chair, who has testified in this committee that he told us that the $50 billion threshold is arbitrary and that we should look at alternative methods for…
I was particularly pleased that, unlike some others, he did not exclude Muslims from that tradition.
One thing that not only Barney Frank, Ms. Barnes and also Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice O'Connor agreed on is that that Kelo decision stripped those three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use.'





