In a previous colloquy, I believe the gentleman granted that the loophole that is being proposed by the gentleman from California (Mr. Doolittle) would allow an ad that says, ``Neil Smith is a terrible Congressman because he opposed voluntary school prayer.'' If they happen to say that he is a bad congressman because he took a position against their position, I know that is uncomfortable, but they have every right to say that.
Discussing the implications of a proposed loophole in campaign advertising.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Housing affordability. It’s too expensive to live in the city of Boston and so I have a tremendous track record on making sure that folks have access to homeownership opportunities.
I thank the gentleman from South Carolina. Sometimes, Mr. Chairman, you live in a neighborhood. You look down the street, and there's a neighbor there. They've got new cars, and they're remodeling the kitchen, and they take a lot of…
I thank the gentleman from Colorado. I understand the point. Some individual Members, I believe, did introduce--the House didn't per se--but did introduce some charges, if you will, against President Bush. The point I am simply trying to…
We have a staggering racial wealth gap. We have inequities in our school system, our health care system. So we can continue to be a world class city while we must make sure it`s for everyone.
Other voices in this conversation
