Mr. Chairman, we have, I think, very clearly identified what is wrong with H.R. 400 and that it is not solved by the manager's amendment. Every applicant for a patent who wishes to get that patent, even before they get the patent, is obliged to disclose. Goodbye to the strategy that you say, ``Well I am trying for a patent but if I do not get it, I want to keep it secret and try the trade secret route.'' One of the aspects that American patent law has right now is a tremendous incentive to the inventor because it allows just that opportunity. I will try for the patent, but if I do not get it, if it does not look like I am going to, then I am going to try the trade secret route.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “Mr. Chairman, we have, I think, very clearly identified what is wrong with H.R. 400 and that it is not solved by the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about H.R. 400 and its implications for patent applicants.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
We have a huge deficit. Everybody knows that. We have a terribly enormous debt. Everybody knows that. None other than the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State have said that our national debt is, in fact, a national security…
I thank the gentleman from Washington for yielding. Mr. Speaker, the facts of the bill have been presented by both of the gentlemen speaking before me. This bill actually passed the floor of this House by a vote of 397-4 in the last…
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.





