I think this is a question that probably should have been fully debated, with some kind of a hearing, and not attached to this bill. The Senator from Montana, Mr. Burns, mentioned what we often call the law of unintended consequences. That is what I am concerned about, too, without adequate input. I know this may help a rancher or a farmer survive, but I can tell you they won't survive very long once the water is gone. I don't know how many Members of this body farm or ranch. I know there are several, including me. You might make a short-term agreement to sell or lease some water, but if there is a change in the water usage and you don't get it back, that is the end of your farming and ranching in the arid West, where we have to store something like 80 percent of our yearly water needs.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “I think this is a question that probably should have been fully debated, with some kind of a hearing, and not attached…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing water usage and its implications for farming and ranching in the arid West.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.
Today I am introducing the Indian Technical Corrections Act of 2003 to provide routine and noncontroversial amendments to Federal statutes affecting Indian tribes and Indian people. The vast majority of these amendments were included in…
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.
Neither President Trump nor his Secretary have the power to demolish a congressionally-created department, and as Attorney General but most importantly as a mom, I will continue to hold this Administration accountable for illegal actions…





