I would say in response, not quite. The phrase is ``necessary to protect human life or to prevent the substantial risk,'' just if I could answer, taking my time back to answer your question fully, ``or to prevent the substantial risk of serious property damage.''
Responding to a question about the language in a legislative context.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Even though the Court did not dispute that the Trump Administration’s decision to cut critical medical and public health research is illegal, they ordered the recipients of that funding — hospitals, researchers, and the state — to jump…
Today's victory protects the integrity of the H-1B visa program as a tool to address severe labor shortages in vital industries like education, healthcare, and medical research.
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.
I jumped into this mayor`s race back in September to say that we have the opportunity to change life outcomes by ensuring we are providing every resident with equal and equitable opportunity.
Other voices in this conversation
