I would say in response, not quite. The phrase is ``necessary to protect human life or to prevent the substantial risk,'' just if I could answer, taking my time back to answer your question fully, ``or to prevent the substantial risk of serious property damage.''
Responding to a question about the language in a legislative context.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Even though the Court did not dispute that the Trump Administration’s decision to cut critical medical and public health research is illegal, they ordered the recipients of that funding — hospitals, researchers, and the state — to jump…
Neither President Trump nor his Secretary have the power to demolish a congressionally-created department, and as Attorney General but most importantly as a mom, I will continue to hold this Administration accountable for illegal actions…
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.
Other voices in this conversation
