The Supreme Court has held in absolutely clear fashion that limits are contributions are constitutional in the context I have given. The only other two I would mention, is it not true that the Supreme Court has for over 50 years upheld the constitutionality on bans of corporations' outright expenditures in campaigns, and the Supreme Court has recently as the Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce case restricted the activity in the campaign field by chambers of commerce?
Andrea Joy Campbell: “The Supreme Court has held in absolutely clear fashion that limits are contributions are constitutional in the context I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing Supreme Court rulings on campaign finance during a debate.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
The guidance and the work that we’re doing to ensure folks know what their rights are is just as important as the litigation that we are filing against the federal administration.
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.
Neither President Trump nor his Secretary have the power to demolish a congressionally-created department, and as Attorney General but most importantly as a mom, I will continue to hold this Administration accountable for illegal actions…





