Mr. President, before I make some comments on the amendment, No. 2623, which we discussed Thursday, listening to the Senator's comments about the so-called gun show loopholes and the point of contact, I might ask, what if a person goes to a gun show and sees something he might like and forgets about it and months later he sees it in a classified ad of a newspaper and buys it through the classified ad in the paper from the man who originally had it at a gun show the year before? Does that make the person liable who had the booth at a gun show? I think this amendment complicates things rather than answers things.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “Mr. President, before I make some comments on the amendment, No. 2623, which we discussed Thursday, listening to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of amendment No. 2623 related to gun show regulations.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.
The guidance and the work that we’re doing to ensure folks know what their rights are is just as important as the litigation that we are filing against the federal administration.
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
Today's victory protects the integrity of the H-1B visa program as a tool to address severe labor shortages in vital industries like education, healthcare, and medical research.





