Just one point: What does this amendment provide? It removes the language by the gentleman from Wisconsin. That language does not say what was reported in the colloquy between the gentleman from Wisconsin and the gentleman from Minnesota, that the NSF may not buy this computer if dumping is found by the Commerce Department. What it says is that NSF cannot go ahead if there has been a ``preliminary'' or a ``final'' determination of dumping. The whole difference here is if the dumping finding is just preliminary and not final. If it is only a preliminary finding, it violates our international obligations to impose sanctions.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “Just one point: What does this amendment provide? It removes the language by the gentleman from Wisconsin. That language…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the National Science Foundation and international trade obligations.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Today's victory protects the integrity of the H-1B visa program as a tool to address severe labor shortages in vital industries like education, healthcare, and medical research.
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
Your office will have a large role in implementation, so I’m assuming that your office is at the table as the Legislature considers this.
The guidance and the work that we’re doing to ensure folks know what their rights are is just as important as the litigation that we are filing against the federal administration.





