Just one point: What does this amendment provide? It removes the language by the gentleman from Wisconsin. That language does not say what was reported in the colloquy between the gentleman from Wisconsin and the gentleman from Minnesota, that the NSF may not buy this computer if dumping is found by the Commerce Department. What it says is that NSF cannot go ahead if there has been a ``preliminary'' or a ``final'' determination of dumping. The whole difference here is if the dumping finding is just preliminary and not final. If it is only a preliminary finding, it violates our international obligations to impose sanctions.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “Just one point: What does this amendment provide? It removes the language by the gentleman from Wisconsin. That language…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the National Science Foundation and international trade obligations.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
The expanded use of domestic natural gas is the most obvious and cost-effective way, immediately and over the long term, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase energy security.
Massachusetts is the medical research capital of the country. We are the proud home of nation-leading universities and research institutions that save lives, create jobs, and help secure a better future. We will not allow the Trump…
We cannot perpetuate misinformation or push information that just doesn’t make sense. It’s our responsibility not to -- misinformation out there, but to make sure that folks in our communities have correct information, get vaccinated…
Even though the Court did not dispute that the Trump Administration’s decision to cut critical medical and public health research is illegal, they ordered the recipients of that funding — hospitals, researchers, and the state — to jump…





