Only the one sentence in the bill that it does not come under the National Labor Relations Act. I explicitly put into the bill a statement that nothing in this bill shall alter in the slightest the application of the National Labor Relations Act or extend to areas which previously it did not extend to. Absolutely false. Not a change. And I will put to the gentleman something he and all of us in the House know. If there were any such implication, the bill would have been referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, which is jealous of its jurisdiction, and it was not. It was kept in Judiciary, dealing strictly with antitrust.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “Only the one sentence in the bill that it does not come under the National Labor Relations Act. I explicitly put into…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to labor relations and antitrust jurisdiction.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Mr. President, before I make some comments on the amendment, No. 2623, which we discussed Thursday, listening to the Senator's comments about the so-called gun show loopholes and the point of contact, I might ask, what if a person goes to…
My life has always been about the possibilities of our city, the pain of when the city doesn`t work for everyone.
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
We cannot perpetuate misinformation or push information that just doesn’t make sense. It’s our responsibility not to -- misinformation out there, but to make sure that folks in our communities have correct information, get vaccinated…





