The argument of the gentleman could just as well be made about a citizen. The gentleman could be here saying, those terrorists who blew up the Oklahoma Federal Courthouse, to protect ourselves from them, we needed to get secret evidence and spirit them away as quickly as possible. We solve this in our Constitution. We have said, no, even to make ourselves more secure against a bombing of that nature, we do not violate the fundamental right of freedom.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “The argument of the gentleman could just as well be made about a citizen. The gentleman could be here saying, those…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing constitutional rights in relation to national security during a debate.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Today's victory protects the integrity of the H-1B visa program as a tool to address severe labor shortages in vital industries like education, healthcare, and medical research.
Even though the Court did not dispute that the Trump Administration’s decision to cut critical medical and public health research is illegal, they ordered the recipients of that funding — hospitals, researchers, and the state — to jump…
I’m smiling because folks will just file bills and say, ‘Who’s going to enforce it?’ ‘The AG, of course,’ and we’re never asked, we’re never engaged.
The guidance and the work that we’re doing to ensure folks know what their rights are is just as important as the litigation that we are filing against the federal administration.





