I would support the content of my friend from New York's amendment if it was applied to the National Labor Relations Act. But, it is way beyond campaign finance reform. For example, it requires disclosure that I happen to support--how much of a union's money goes to a strike versus how much goes to organizing. I would like to see that part of the law. I would like to see the laborers of this country know where their dues are spent. But it is not campaign finance reform. And, by putting it into this bill, it breaks the coalition that is essential for Shays-Meehan to become the law of this country. I strongly oppose this amendment for that reason. We must be about our business today. Our business is campaign finance reform.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “I would support the content of my friend from New York's amendment if it was applied to the National Labor Relations…”
On the recordJuly 20, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to campaign finance reform during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Jun 26, 2026
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
May 25, 2011
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. {time} 2130 It is now in order to consider amendment No. 55…
Jan 22, 2003
I will work with the Senator from Washington, my ranking member, and the Customs Service to achieve this important goal. We must work hard to plug the security holes that exist, and this is one we should fix.





