There were things in the bill, however, that the universities do not like, like the reexamination procedure. They think they have a patent and then suddenly under this bill it can be opened up for reexamination in ways and in processes not under existing law. I agree with my colleague, the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Frank]. The burden of proof is on anyone who wants to change the status quo, and that is true of the gentleman from California [Mr. Rohrabacher] and it is true of the gentleman from North Carolina [Mr. Coble]. But if you ask the universities, their bottom line is leave it alone, and that is what we should do today.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “There were things in the bill, however, that the universities do not like, like the reexamination procedure. They think…”
On the recordApril 17, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing concerns from universities regarding a bill's reexamination procedure.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Jun 9, 2026
Today's victory protects the integrity of the H-1B visa program as a tool to address severe labor shortages in vital industries like education, healthcare, and medical research.
Aug 21, 2025
Even though the Court did not dispute that the Trump Administration’s decision to cut critical medical and public health research is illegal, they ordered the recipients of that funding — hospitals, researchers, and the state — to jump…
Jun 2, 2025
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.





