No, sir. I think that may be the accurate description of some. It is not mine. Here is why. Shays-Meehan does not violate Buckley v. Valeo's prohibition on expenditure. Buckley v. Valeo allowed limits on contributions.
Discussing the implications of the Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform legislation.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
The guidance and the work that we’re doing to ensure folks know what their rights are is just as important as the litigation that we are filing against the federal administration.
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
One thing I think we demonstrated in the first 100 days of this administration — and continue to — is that we are organized, we are strategic, and we’re unafraid to take on what’s coming, whether that be unlawful executive orders or…
Other voices in this conversation
