No, sir. I think that may be the accurate description of some. It is not mine. Here is why. Shays-Meehan does not violate Buckley v. Valeo's prohibition on expenditure. Buckley v. Valeo allowed limits on contributions.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “No, sir. I think that may be the accurate description of some. It is not mine. Here is why. Shays-Meehan does not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform legislation.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
I thank the gentleman from South Carolina. Sometimes, Mr. Chairman, you live in a neighborhood. You look down the street, and there's a neighbor there. They've got new cars, and they're remodeling the kitchen, and they take a lot of…
Because we now do not have a partner at the federal level looking to advance consumer protection, more of these cases now fall on us.
This decision will have severe consequences in Massachusetts, where thousands of TPS holders fill critical roles in our healthcare and elder care industries.
This bill today, H.R. 4809, is a bill to reauthorize the Defense Production Act. Simply put, the Defense Production Act is a bill that is intended to minimize distortions to the economy when it is necessary for the government to take…





