We need to therefore observe the distinction in the language that affirmative action is not in this executive order, that it is absurd to consider that this executive order will lead to affirmative action because one would have to observe the characteristic. And nobody, nobody, including the worst critics of this President, are saying that he is ordering the ascertainment of whether one is gay or straight in the Federal employment sector. Lastly and most importantly, although my good friend from Massachusetts and I may part company on this, I appreciate his kindness in yielding to me to make this point once again to those of us who believe there should never be the use of race or gender to distinguish among American citizens by their government, that if you buy the argument that this executive order leads to the use of orientation by the government and leads to quotas, you are giving up the argument on every other aspect that we are fighting so hard to establish in title VII law.
Andrea Joy Campbell: “We need to therefore observe the distinction in the language that affirmative action is not in this executive order…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an executive order related to affirmative action and employment.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
Housing affordability. It’s too expensive to live in the city of Boston and so I have a tremendous track record on making sure that folks have access to homeownership opportunities.
My life has always been about the possibilities of our city, the pain of when the city doesn`t work for everyone.
Today's victory protects the integrity of the H-1B visa program as a tool to address severe labor shortages in vital industries like education, healthcare, and medical research.
This amendment really ought to be a no- brainer. It cuts $11 million from the USDA Wildlife Services' livestock protection program. Let me give you four reasons why this should be a no-brainer. First of all, it saves $11 million. Not the…





