First of all, as I am sure she knows, I have always been a big supporter of increased money going into breast cancer research, as she has. And I commend her for the leadership she has taken on this issue. In fact, many of our colleagues have not only supported additional research money but have participated on our own time on Saturdays and Sundays in raising private funds for breast cancer research. The most common that we are aware of is the Susan Komen Foundation and The Run for the Cure, which is done all over the United States. Just a few weeks ago here in Washington, DC, we had something like 45,000 or 50,000 people that contributed money to run through the streets of Washington to help raise money for that very, very badly needed program. But I am a little concerned. She mentioned a few of the concerns already. But I am told that the chairman of the authorizing subcommittee, Senator Cochran, has some concerns about this proposal, as does Senator Stevens who will be here in about 25 minutes to make some comments on it, too. First, one of my concerns is certainly the administrative costs to the Postal Service. I think they would be significant, as I understand it. I would like to ask the Senator. Is there a provision that allows them to recoup their costs?
Andrea Joy Campbell: “First of all, as I am sure she knows, I have always been a big supporter of increased money going into breast cancer…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for breast cancer research and concerns about related proposals.
Share
More from Andrea Joy Campbell
I thank the gentleman from Washington for yielding. Mr. Speaker, the facts of the bill have been presented by both of the gentlemen speaking before me. This bill actually passed the floor of this House by a vote of 397-4 in the last…
The guidance and the work that we’re doing to ensure folks know what their rights are is just as important as the litigation that we are filing against the federal administration.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. {time} 2120 Amendment No. 54 Offered by Mr. Campbell The…
I appreciate my colleague's comments; and, frankly, I don't disagree that it is arbitrary. I would argue that perhaps how we got to this 800,000 was not by anybody doing a great deal of planning either, so perhaps that is arbitrary. But…





